Wilshire State Bank Accused of Racketeering in Lawsuit


San Diego, CA -- (SBWIRE) -- 07/16/2012 -- Wilshire State Bank, a subsidiary of Wilshire Bancorp Inc., (Nasdaq: WIBC) has been named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

The complaint (CV12-05244 PA AGRx) filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California alleges that defendants Wilshire State Bank, Pearson Affiliated Inc., Keller Williams Commercial Realty, Dornin Investment Group et al, used the U.S. Postal system, the internet and telephone as agents of fear, terrorizing tenants of a Wilshire State Bank lender-foreclosed property to force them to move.

The suit alleges that under Wilshire State Bank’s “evict and sell” business model, when Wilshire State Bank became the owner of 701 South Mariposa through foreclosure, Wilshire State Bank chose to evict the tenants residing at the property in order to enhance the property’s sales prospects and to facilitate the sale of the foreclosed property.

Also named in the lawsuit is realtor Yitzy Pearson of Pearson Affiliated, John Safi of SAFCO Capital Group, realtor Seth Polen of Keller Williams Commercial Realty, Chris Dornin of Dornin Investment Group and Roman Celusta of 709 South Mariposa Inc.

The suit alleges that the plaintiff’s mailbox became a source of fear and intimidation as the defendants misused the U.S. Postal System to pepper the plaintiff with written notices, demanding that the plaintiff accept a relocation offer or face imminent eviction. Continuous intimidation, threats of eviction, threats of homelessness and financial injury were allegedly directed at the plaintiff to induce the plaintiff to move.

The alleged scheme which involved 1) Wilshire State Bank, a leading FDIC-regulated banking institution and 2) Pearson Affiliated Inc., a full-service property management company and 3) SAFCO Capital Group, a real estate management firm and 4) Keller Williams Realty, a commercial real estate firm and 5) Dornin Investment Group, a commercial real estate investment firm has allegedly defrauded the plaintiff’s neighbors of their residential dwellings.

The RICO suit alleges that each defendant was integral to the enterprise’s objective which was to rid the lender’s foreclosed property of rent-controlled tenants by any means necessary. The threat of eviction and the filing of meritless Unlawful Detainer actions against the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s former neighbors were used as forms of “extortionist litigation”. The suit alleges that the defend